Inclusivity Concerns: Beauty Brands' Sunscreen Controversies
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
In this episode, James Welsh delves into the Tower 28 sunscreen saga, revealing a glaring issue in the beauty industry's quest for inclusivity. The sunscreen, touted as invisible on all skin tones, fell short when tested on deeper skin tones, leaving an unsightly white cast. This blunder echoes a similar misstep seen in Euphoria's foundation launch, where deeper shades missed the mark entirely. Welsh points out that brands often prioritize clean beauty trends over efficacy, opting for zinc sunscreens that don't cater to all skin tones.
Furthermore, the apology issued by Tower 28 came across as performative and lacking genuine inclusivity, further highlighting the disconnect between brand messaging and product reality. Moving on, Welsh shifts focus to Primally Pure, a clean beauty brand causing a stir with their sunscreen campaign. By labeling other sunscreens as "poison," the brand attempts to create controversy but ends up spreading misinformation and fear-mongering tactics. Experts in the beauty community, including dermatologists and cosmetic chemists, have criticized the campaign for its misleading claims.
The founder of Primally Pure defends the campaign as a means to raise awareness about certain ingredients linked to hormone disruption. However, this approach has been debunked by experts like Dr. Michelle Wong, who emphasize the safety of sunscreen in cosmetics. Welsh concludes by condemning brands that prioritize fear-based marketing over science and inclusivity, highlighting the importance of creating products that are grounded in efficacy and cater to diverse skin tones. The incidents discussed serve as a cautionary tale for the beauty industry, urging brands to prioritize authenticity and inclusivity over sensationalism.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch Trash Formulas, Fake Inclusive Marketing - Why Everyone's Talking About Tower 28's New Sunscreen! on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for Trash Formulas, Fake Inclusive Marketing - Why Everyone's Talking About Tower 28's New Sunscreen!
Discussion on Tower 28 sunscreen causing white cast on darker skin tones
Criticism of deceptive marketing strategies by brands
Lack of diversity in inclusive skincare products
Frustration with lack of progress in sunscreen technology in the US
Appreciation for James' honesty and commitment to truth in skincare
Concerns about harmful ingredients in certain sunscreens
Critiques on brands not considering all BIPOC communities
Disappointment in brands' behavior and lack of transparency
Questioning the need for sunscreen on melanin-rich skin
Appreciation for James' video directing viewers to other informative content creators
Related Articles
James Welsh Reviews You Like Reglow LED Mask: Sleek Design, 272 LEDs, 4 Therapy Modes
James Welsh reviews the You Like Reglow LED mask, praising its sleek design, 272 LEDs, four therapy modes, and 360° mirror reflection technology. Consistency is key for visible results in calming redness and improving skin texture. Try it with a discount code!
Iconic K-Beauty Products: 2025 Relevance and Trends
James Welsh reviews iconic K-beauty products' relevance in 2025, from the Haruharu sunscreen to Laneige lip mask. He critiques trends like the Banila Co cleansing balm and Innisfree serum, emphasizing the shift towards gentler exfoliation methods.
James Welsh x VT Cosmetics: Anti-Aging & Blemish Control Box Launch
James Welsh unveils his exclusive skincare collaboration box with VT Cosmetics, focusing on anti-aging and blemish control. Launching on June 23rd for $39, this box offers innovative products like the Real Shot 100 Black Truffle and Garlic AC Spot Cream. Don't miss out on this limited edition release!
Gender Double Standards in Aging: Biohacking vs. Vanity
James Welsh discusses gender double standards in aging perceptions. Men like George Clooney are praised as "silver foxes," while women like Amelia Clark face criticism. Society views men's anti-aging efforts as biohacking, but women's as vanity. The analysis sheds light on societal biases in aging perceptions based on gender.