Road Skin Peptide Lip Treatment Issues: Customer Backlash and BBB Rating
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
Road Skin, the brainchild of Haley Bieber, found itself in hot water over its iconic peptide lip treatments turning grainy, smelly, and even green, sparking a wave of discontent among customers and landing the brand with a dismal F rating from the BBB. Despite a successful launch with a small lineup featuring products like the peptide glazing fluid and barrier restore cream, Road Skin's image took a hit due to persistent issues with its popular lip treatments. Cosmetic experts pointed to crystallization of fatty acids in shea butter as a possible cause of the grainy texture, while the brand faced backlash for suggesting customers warm the product to restore its quality.
Complaints about the unpleasant smell and discoloration of the lip treatments raised questions about the brand's choice of preservatives, packaging quality, and storage conditions. Allegations of allergic reactions and skin irritations prompted discussions on the potential sensitivity to fragrances and the product's shelf life. Despite the lack of public statements addressing these concerns from Road Skin, customers continued to express dissatisfaction with the brand's handling of the situation, with reports of delayed refunds and unresponsive customer service adding fuel to the fire.
The ongoing saga surrounding Road Skin's peptide lip treatments highlighted a disconnect between the brand's initial promise of affordable luxury skincare and the reality faced by consumers grappling with subpar products. As the controversy unfolded, industry experts and disgruntled customers alike scrutinized the brand's formulations and quality control measures, with some questioning whether Road Skin had prioritized aesthetics over product efficacy and safety. With the brand's reputation tarnished and a cloud of uncertainty hanging over its future, Road Skin faced a pivotal moment in its journey from beauty industry darling to embattled underdog.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch Grainy, Smelly, Irritating…GREEN: What Happened to Rhode’s Lip Balm? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for Grainy, Smelly, Irritating…GREEN: What Happened to Rhode’s Lip Balm?
Quality control issues with Rhode products
Concerns about transparency with ingredients, specifically peanut-based ingredients
Mixed experiences with product reactions, including graininess and smell
Pricing concerns
Positive experiences with other Rhode products
Comments on the brand's "clean beauty" status
Skepticism towards celebrity skincare brands
Speculation on manufacturing practices and ingredient quality
Debate on the effectiveness and appeal of celebrity brands
Suggestions for reformulation of products
Related Articles
James Welsh Reviews You Like Reglow LED Mask: Sleek Design, 272 LEDs, 4 Therapy Modes
James Welsh reviews the You Like Reglow LED mask, praising its sleek design, 272 LEDs, four therapy modes, and 360° mirror reflection technology. Consistency is key for visible results in calming redness and improving skin texture. Try it with a discount code!
Iconic K-Beauty Products: 2025 Relevance and Trends
James Welsh reviews iconic K-beauty products' relevance in 2025, from the Haruharu sunscreen to Laneige lip mask. He critiques trends like the Banila Co cleansing balm and Innisfree serum, emphasizing the shift towards gentler exfoliation methods.
James Welsh x VT Cosmetics: Anti-Aging & Blemish Control Box Launch
James Welsh unveils his exclusive skincare collaboration box with VT Cosmetics, focusing on anti-aging and blemish control. Launching on June 23rd for $39, this box offers innovative products like the Real Shot 100 Black Truffle and Garlic AC Spot Cream. Don't miss out on this limited edition release!
Gender Double Standards in Aging: Biohacking vs. Vanity
James Welsh discusses gender double standards in aging perceptions. Men like George Clooney are praised as "silver foxes," while women like Amelia Clark face criticism. Society views men's anti-aging efforts as biohacking, but women's as vanity. The analysis sheds light on societal biases in aging perceptions based on gender.